Monday, March 26, 2012

Moral Hazard

David Li's paper "On Default Correlation: A Copula Function Approach" (2000) was the first appearance of the Gaussian copula applied to CDOs, which quickly became a tool for financial institutions to correlate associations between multiple securities. This allowed for CDOs to be supposedly accurately priced for a wide range of investments that were previously too complex to price, such as mortgages. However in the aftermath of the Global financial crisis of 2008–2009 the model has been seen as fundamentally flawed and a "recipe for disaster". According to Nassim Nicholas Taleb, "People got very excited about the Gaussian copula because of its mathematical elegance, but the thing never worked. Co-association between securities is not measurable using correlation"; in other words because past history is not predictive of the future "anything that relies on correlation is charlatanism."

Definition of ‘Moral Hazard.’
The risk that a party to a transaction has not entered into the contract in good faith, has provided misleading information about its assets, liabilities or credit capacity, or has an incentive to take unusual risks in a desperate attempt to earn a profit before the contract settles.
As we wind down into the last days of the biggest Ponzi scheme ever created a few banking details that are now common will seem so absurd in just a few years. We will look back at these days and wonder how this generation could be so insane.
We all know the answer deep inside, people like to believe they can get something for nothing. Politicians, bankers, and Wall Street put out the bait, riches, benefits, the lifestyle, like a drug dealer offering free crack cocaine. At first people are curious, they pause and wonder…
Soon some begin to take the drugs, the freebies. Nothing happens, they feel good. They tell others. Soon there is a mad rush for the freebies. The freebies are made into law. The law is glorified. And the drug addiction sets in, skillfully placed there so carefully by politicians and bankers who now have the ability to plunder millions from the economically illiterate citizens.
Once addicted to the freebies reason disappears and all that remains is the constant drive for the high. The addicted citizens will pay any price to keep the freebies coming, the addiction consumes them.
The world disappears all around the victims as they focus on getting high, nothing else is relevant. Get high, get more freebies than the next guy, and make it through another day, maybe a week, but keep getting high. More Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, education, college, birth control, the list is endless. The quest for financing the sickness reaches epoch proportions. The dope must be delivered!!!
That is were we are today. Wall Street, Washington, Europe, China, Japan, begging for just one more fix of “dope,” money, liquidity, quantitative easing, mortgage swaps, credit swaps, discount windows, money, money, money. The dope must be administered to the finance Wall Street junkies, retires, welfare recipients, food stamp recipients, the dope MUST be delivered at all cost! Dope, dope, dope, we need dope!
The Federal Reserve will be there to satisfy the junkies. And the Central Bank of Japan, the Central Bank of China, the European Central Bank, all there to create the dope that the world’s financial elites, and dependents crave and must have to survive.
Below are some observations from some people actually working in finance, some on Wall Street, who see the insanity for what is…suicide. The quotes are actual with interpretations as well as cleaning up the language.

The first one is from “Stak Edwards”
“I think to myself how ridiculous the “official” story of the financial collapse is. We the people are supposed to believe that after hundreds if not thousands of years of banking history by which to go on, that all of the sudden some physicist (David Li) came up with a formula by which prudent underwriting of loans was no longer needed. And that we should abandon prudent underwriting now as it is no longer necessary.
Yeah right.
What a line of bull. Now we can lend to people with no job and poor credit virtually any amount, because this physicist came up with a new formula that can somehow distribute this risk. It could not possibly be that since the big banks were using Other Peoples Money and therefore had no stake in the outcome that they really could care less as long as they got their fee out of the deal. It is such a crock of crap.”
The moral hazard here is federal government is afraid to come out and say our biggest financial institutions are run by crooks. Furthermore, these crooks own the FED, so we are apparently SOL.
Unfortunately for the citizens who suffer we now condone fraud to benefit these bankers because they just cannot secure sufficient wealth for themselves by running legitimate banking operations. No, as is typical of our federal government they would rather lie, obfuscate, deny, and generally cover up the banks wrong doing. Oh, and give em a few hundred billion for their hard work, of taxpayer money no less. What a sad state of affairs. Or throw some fines on them and also provide taxpayer money to pay said fines. Move money from the left pocket to the right pocket in a show of solidarity with the citizens.
BTW, I don’t think the deadbeats were the victims here. No they got the couple years free ride they are used to getting. The victims IMO were the prudent that put big down payments and now find themselves not only without equity but deep underwater. They find that not only that, Bernanke has decided to further financially repress said people by not allowing them to earn any interest on their savings.”
Authors comment; The Federal Reserves zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) punishes savers, many of whom are the elderly on fixed incomes. Standard banking procedure would be to set the interest rate 2% to 4% above the inflation rate or 2.9% + 3% = 5.9% in today’s climate.
Continue on with Stax Edwards;
“They find that they have lost their jobs and must spend their retirement money to get by.
Thomas Jefferson called it when he said first by inflation then by deflation….The banks will inherit the earth. For the deadbeats, we have federal government programs to relieve them of responsibility. For the prudent, the banks have their assets to attack if they walk.
I only wish Fisher were serious when he said he supports breaking up To Big To Fails (TBTF’s). I fear this was lip service since they are the shareholders he reports to. Got to go vomit now, I am getting physically ill.”

From fnord88;
Authors note; Prior to 1913 and the creation of the Federal Reserve inflation was virtually zero. For thousands of years gold and silver were used as the medium of exchange because it was portable, limited in supply, easy to verify value by weight, store of value and a unit of account. When there is no inflation economic decisions by everyday people are simplified tremendously,
do I spend,
do I save,
do I invest.
Continued with fnord88;
“Exactly, capitalism based around constant inflation is the biggest fu…… scam in the history of the world. It forces everyone to become speculators. And the more I read and think, the more I become convinced that speculation is the root of many of our problems.
Not just because it forces people to gamble with money they should be able to save, but because speculation is based around two competing emotions: fear and greed. Spend long enough with those two emotions dominating your personality; you turn into a psychopath. Seriously.
I should have been clearer. For those of us the enjoy risk, speculation is fine, its a way of getting ahead using brain power rather enslaving oneself to some company that does not give a crap about you.
For people like my mother though, who just retired after 45 years teaching disabled kids, who have only self funded superannuation, it’s fu….. evil.

Inflation before 1913 was virtually zero. There is no need for this chart before 1913.

Government in Australia forces you to put money into super, which is then ripped of by money managers with ridiculous fees, and then invested in the stock market only to lose most of it. Instead of being able to retire and live comfortably after a life of putting others first, now she, and her family, have to stress and worry about money probably until the day she dies. Makes me want to shoot somebody in the fu…. head.”
Authors note; The problem for the United States started in 1913. That was the Woodrow Wilson administration, not Reagan, Bush, or Obama. That was the year we started the Federal Reserve, ended state legislature elections of senators, and instituted the federal income tax.
With the coming worldwide collapse of the fiat currency, 2 years, 6 years, everyday people need to understand sound money and our current unsound fiat money. Some clear goals should be followed when our society is rebuilt after the bankruptcy.
1. Federal governments restricted to consuming no more than 11% of the GDP.
2. Gold/silver used as bank reserves.
3. No central bank, let banks issue their own currency. With modern communications this would be very simple task.
Getting banking and money out of the worlds federal governments hands would ensure balanced budgets, balance trade, promote essentially one currency worldwide, eliminate theft by politicians, elites, and other parasites.
There would be a end to economic distortions in the economy and people could go back to being free and productive. Their economic choices would be simplifies into;
1. Do I spend my money?
2. Do I save my money?
3. Do I invest my money?
I think we can all handle that.

Latest Wikileaks Dump Shows 2008 Election was a Fraud

Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange
From: Fred Burton [mailto:burton@stratfor.com]

Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 7:41 AM
To: secure@stratfor.com
Subject: Insight – The Dems & Dirty Tricks ** Internal Use Only – Pls Do
Not Forward **
** Internal Use Only – Pls Do Not Forward **
1) The black Dems were caught stuffing the ballot boxes in Philly and Ohio as reported the night of the election and Sen. McCain chose not to fight. The matter is not dead inside the party. It now becomes a matter of sequence now as to how and when to “out”.
2) It appears the Dems “made a donation” to Rev. Jesse (no, they would never do that!) to keep his yap shut after his diatribe about the Jews and Israel. A little bird told me it was a “nice six-figure donation”. This also becomes a matter of how and when to out.

John McCain was never serious about winning the 2008 election, it was just another military operation to promote diversity

3) The hunt is on for the sleezy Russian money into O-mans coffers. A smoking gun has already been found. Will get more on this when the time is right. My source was too giddy to continue. Can you say Clinton and ChiCom funny money? This also becomes a matter of how and when to out.
A second Wikileaks cable indicates that 2008 Republican Presidential candidate John McCain decided not to pursue legal action against the Democrats for engaging in voter fraud. The candidate believed that to do so would have thrown the country into civil unrest, and thus, he let the matter drop.
Emails between Stratfor staffers indicate that McCain’s actions were viewed as baffling, to say the least.
Conservatives are not dumb. McCain never wanted to win the election. McCain is a statist and he intentionally sabotaged the election when he let the novice Palin run around with the NYC press skank Couric for days. McCain knew better, Palin did not.
McCain agrees with Obama’s positions on everything and probably felt Obama would be a good example as a black president.
There never was a serious effort by McCain to win the election. No attacks on Obama’s communist past, no investigations into Obama’s college days and his drug mule trip to Pakistan, which gave Obama the money to get his Columbia degree, nothing of substance.

The 2008 election was a complete fraud.
The only way I knew of Obama was the Israeli Defense Force was feeding a NYC blogger Pamela Geller some pretty good information prior to the election. She tried desperately to get some attention in the MSM and was completely ignored. Sean Hannity is the only MSM personality to cover Obama’s “radical past.”
As for the corruption that is well known about. American elections have been frauds. The 2000 stolen election was a payback by Republicans for the 1960 Democrat stolen election.
We do not have fair elections in America, never. Its a myth just like freedom, justice, and the American way. We are a superpower, other people buy our bonds, we live well and write history.

Talk Show Hack Mark Levin Attacks Libertarian Murray Rothbard

Levin, the Neocon, fight every war for Israel. talk show host Mark Levin attacked Murray Rothbard and Ron Paul on his radio show.
To cut to the chase Levin is a Israel first, America second war monger who believes in the Federal Reserve because it finances his NYC elites lifestyle for which they have become accustomed too, and the war machine that defends Israel.
Rothbard exposed the corrupting oppressiveness role of the federal government and the rip off artist at the Federal Reserve in several books including “Americas Great Depression” and the “History of Money and Banking in the United States.”
Levin cannot stand, what he considered a traitor to the Zionist cause, Rothbard, exposing all the secrets of banking and theft by the elites to the unwashed masses. Levin cannot stand someone like Ron Paul standing up to the Zionist government in Washington and standing that financial aid to Israel should be cut off and Israel left to make peace with its neighbors. That is what the fuss is about.
Rothbard was a man who got pissed off about one class of elites ripping off another class of citizens using purposeful economic ignorance and deception. He exposed the elites rip off techniques. Stripped of their curtain, grosly naked, for the public to see.
I would encourage everyone to read the free e-books for yourself and judge Rothbard’s works.

Where is the Money? Richest Areas in the USA, Wall Street and Washington

If there is any doubt in Americans minds who the federal government is working for hopefully this will clear things up. The federal government works for the federal government and Wall Street.
The Federal Reserve is there to feed the federal government and Wall Street cheap cash whenever needed, and it is needed a lot these days. With a unlimited supply of counterfeited cash Wall Street and Washington will ALWAYS win any economic battle. Simply stated when you own the bank and can print cash you can outbid the peasants for resources anytime you wish to do so. The game is rigged.
This parasitic system could not exist without the Federal Reserve creating money out of thin air. There are two reasons earlier Americans destroyed the first and second central banks of the United States, corruption and inflation. Today we are receiving the same treatment and like earlier Americans need to destroy the central bank, get back to 100% fractional reserve banking, sound money, gold, silver.
This third central bank will end up exactly like the first two did, corruption and inflation.
The following articles were posted in the Washington Post and Lew Rockwell.
Two Virginia counties take the top spots — Loudoun and Fairfax. And two Maryland counties close out the top 10 — Calvert and Charles.

When you own the bank creating money is a lot of fun. Stupid uneducated people have to work for money, but not bankers and politicians!

By Washington Post editors
Seven of the nation’s 10 richest counties are in the Washington region, according to a report from Newsweek.
The ranking is based on data from the 2009 Census.
Check out the complete list:
1. Loudoun County — Median income $114,204
2. Fairfax County — Median income $102,499
3. Howard County — Median income $101,940
4. Morris County, N.J. — Median income $96,787
5. Arlington County — Median income $96,218
6. Montgomery County — Median income $94,420
7. Nassau County, N.Y. — Median Income $92,776
8. Somerset County, N.J. — Median income $89,871
9. Calvert County — Median income $89,289
10. Charles County — Median income $89,115
By Washington Post editors | November 12, 2010; 11:25 AM ET
The Richest Zip Codes in the United States
by Robert Wenzel
Economic Policy Journal

Robert Wenzel of the Economic Policy Journal

Recently by Robert Wenzel: ‘Anomic Breakdown‘ and Beyond
Of 29,000 zip codes examined by the Internal Revenue Service, only three had an average yearly income of one million dollars or more, based on recently released data from 2008. But the average income per year for all of the top ten richest zip codes exceeds $700,000, according to IRS data, reports HuffPo.
Three of the wealthiest five zip codes are located in New York City. Among its residents, Manhattan has 7,270 people worth $30 million or more.
1. Lower Manhattan 10274
2. 30 Rockefeller Plaza 10112
3. Fisher Island, FL 33109
4. 45 Rockefeller Plaza 10111
5. Oklahoma City, OK 73154
6. Downtown Chicago 60604
7. Atherton, CA 94027
8. Century City Los Angeles 90067
9. New Vernon, NJ 07976
10. Grand Central Station, NY 10168
The top zip code, 10272, begins only blocks from the New York Federal Reserve Bank. (Just coincidence, I’m sure.)
Number 2 and 4 zip codes, different parts of Rockefeller Center, are, of course, home to Rockefeller Family money management and where former Fed chairman Paul Volcker maintains an office. (More coincidence, I’m sure.)
Reprinted with permission from Economic Policy Journal.

Michelle Obama Secret Affair Rumors Surface

It has been in the press for years that Obama has had several homosexual partners, none proven, but very circumstantial. Now comes the report that Michele is getting into he act, at the worst possible time for Obummer. Anything for the cause.
Posted by Jim Hoft on Saturday, December 10, 2011, 9:00 PM
“It’s a good thing her last name is not Cain or this story would be making major headlines by now.
America’s Conservative News reported:

Another White House sex scandal? Has Obama's multiple boyfriends given Michelle the cover she needs to cheat?

The Globe magazine just released a bombshell and is reporting that Michelle Obama is having a “steamy secret affair” with a Secret Service Agent. According to The Globe, rumors started to circulate that Obama may be having an affair after her recent admission to NBC’s Al Roker that she frequently “sneaks out” of the White House; and the ever increasing time she is spending away from the White House may be a cover to hide “a sizzling affair she’s carrying on with a Secret Service agent.”
According to The Globe’s anonymous source: “The rumors are that she’s getting it on with a Secret Service agent who is not part of her detail. … Her frequent outings away from the White House give her and him an opportunity to get together.” The source adds: “Something has been going on for a couple of months and there’s no question Barack is embarrassed about her increasingly frequent excursions away from him at the White House.”
The allegations are, of course, unsubstantiated and only time will tell if the allegations will fizzle or blow up into a major issuing in the upcoming presidential campaign. Typically, the media will not report unsubstantiated claims from anonymous sources, but the recent media feeding frenzy over unsubstantiated allegation against businessman Herman Cain, which literally sank his candidacy, leave the question open: will the media pursue, or even bother to investigate this story?
When it comes to the Mainstream Media, anything goes. That much is clear. But will the media apply the same standard to Obama as to Cain? Only time will tell.
Hat Tip Rachel”

ow Do Gas Prices Increase?

Be careful who you piss off (Israel) on the way up, you might meet them again on the way down
Every four years or so, election years of 2008 and 2012, gas prices spike up, and all the talking heads give their spin on why this happens. The left blame speculators, the right blames lack of supply and the truth gets lost in useless arguments. What ends up happening is people receive misinformation about economics.
So what are the facts?
Prices are determined by supply and demand. That is the beginning but there are other factors, “independent” variables, which can affect supply and demand.
The “independent” variables for demand are;
1. Income. If a good or service is “normal” people want more of it when they make more money, demand will increase. If it is inferior, they want less. People generally buy less fast food when their incomes rise.
The real disposable personal income has dropped from $32,814 from when Obama was inaugurated in January 2009 to $32,458 today. A decrease of 1.1%. So if gas prices were $1.84 a gallon when Obama was inaugurated we would expect them to be about $1.82 all things being equal.

Oil production supply is relatively "inelastic" in the short run. Drilling crews, machinery, leases, political hurdles, all have to be overcome before production begins

2. Price of related goods. Unfortunately with the exception of the Chevy Volt there are no substitutes for gas during this time frame, 2009 to today.
We subsidize farmers to grow corn for ethanol, driving up food prices, while imposing tariffs on cheap, $2.00 a gallon Brazilian bio-fuel. If Washington DC eliminated the tariffs on the $2.00 Brazilian bio-fuel we could lower the cost of both fuel and food at the same time. Corn farmers would be priced out of the ethanol market and would have to substitute back to food production, but with the current crop of corrupt politicians this will never happen.
3. Taste. This variable has not changed significantly since 2009. People prefer cars to bikes and scooters.
4. Population and demographics. The population has increased from 306,208,000 to 313,020, or a 2.22% increase. Using our baseline of $1.84 for gas the price today should be about $1.88 a gallon.
5. Expected future prices. This is the most controversial of the five. Nancy Pelosi refers to this variable as “speculators” and she is correct. If consumers expect higher prices they will, if possible, consumer more today. They are speculators forecasting into the future. There is nothing Nancy, or the federal government can do about speculation. It’s like legislating against cow flatulence. The only way to stop it is to kill a bunch of cows.

Tensions between Israel and Iran can play a role in the price of oil

Also playing into expected future prices is world politics. If Saudi Arabia does not like the Obama Administration they can cut back on oil production, or threaten to cut back, and prices will increase.
If Israel does not want to see the Obama Administration re-elected they can pick a fight with Iran, or pretend to be picking a fight with Iran.
If Iran is suffering from inflation and desperately needs higher oil prices, and their number one export is crude oil, they might choose to play along with Israel in the mutually beneficial game of war chicken, hoping one or the other will back down at the last minute.
While the tensions between the two are high they both enjoy the desired results, bad publicity for the Obama Administration, more revenue for Iran. As long as the game does not go into a actual “hot” war both win. This is sometimes referred to as a Nash Equilibrium and/or dominate strategy.
The “independent” variables for supply are;
1. Price of inputs. This would not be the end product, oil, but the cost associated with producing oil. Workers wages, drilling equipment, leasing land, and so forth.
For this example we will assume the cost is directly translated into a price increase. Of course in the “real” world there would be a lot of mitigating circumstances, such as the elasticity of demand, inelasticity, and other factors. But here we will keep it simple and assume there is a direct, one to one, correlation between these variables.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) has increased from 211.962 (1982-84 dollars= 100 MSA) to 227.505, a 7.3% increase or translated to $1.97 for a gallon of gas. The Producer Price Index has increased 17.1% or translated to $2.15 a gallon.
2. Technological change. For petroleum production there has not been a dramatic change since 2009 that I am aware of. Assume this has had a negligible affect on the price.

Gas prices going up

3. Price of substitutes in production. Again, the only viable substitute is Brazilian bio-fuel, which is not allowed to compete because of tariffs.
4. Number of firms in the marketplace. There has not been substantial entry or exit since 2009.
5 Expected future prices. Suppliers “speculate” the same as consumers do. And this is where Obama plays a role in gas prices TODAY. If oil producers see the Obama Administration doing everything in its power to suppress supply, no new leases, regulations, more taxes, then it will have a effect on the price TODAY.
Why would it not?
Does Nancy Pelosi want to outlaw rational thought? Speculators are doing the best they can to deal with reality. If the President of the United States is hostile to oil production and consumption why would this not be reflected in the price of gasoline?
On the flip side if the president announced 100% support for the oil industry, drilling on a first come, first serve basis, prices would drop TODAY based on future expected increase in supply.
World supply has increased 2.2% from 2009 to 2010, 80,278 thousands of barrels daily to 82,095. Demand has increased from 84,714 to 87,382, 3.1%. The biggest increase in consumption was 5.3%, from the Asian Pacific countries including China and India.
The discrepancy between the amount of oil produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes, refinery gains, and other complicating factors.
So based on increased consumption and the inelasticity of demand for crude oil, -0.06, translated, for every 10% increase in price consumers consume 0.6% less of the product, we can estimate that the price would increase to roughly $2.02 a gallon taking into account also the inelastic supply of oil production. Since I only have 2010 data let’s add on another 18 cents and make the price $2.20 per gallon.
From the previous data we know that all things being equal the price of gas should be about, in a worse case scenario, say about $2.50 a gallon. An educated guess, nothing more than that. Not pleasant but nowhere near the $3.70 a gallon today that we pay.
So what happened?
Now let’s put together a simple model.
If we have 100 gallons of gas, 100 customers, and $100 dollars split 100 ways consumers will buy a gallon of gas for $1 a gallon.
Simple.
That is supply and demand. If there is more supply, 200 gallons of gas, the price drops to 50 cents a gallon. If the supply is 50 gallons the price will increase to $2.00 a gallon. Notice that price acts as a rationing device, everyone gets what they need, and what is available, and not what they want.
If the number of dollars increased to $200 the price will go up to $2.00 a gallon if the supply remains stable at 100 gallons.
Did you get that?
One of the big factors that is overlooked by the talking head “economist” is the relationship between printing dollars, the Federal Reserve, and inflation.
Simply put all that Obama Administration spending has to come from three sources;
1. Taxes. Tax receipts as a percentage of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) since 2009 have been 15.1%, 15.1%, and 15.4% of the GDP. Historically this percent has been around 18%. Spending has increased to 25.2%, 24.1%, and 24.1% of the GDP. This is important as will be explained.
2. Borrowing. This is not necessarily inflationary. Remember when you borrow from person x, person x forgoes consumption, but must be paid back in interest.

Federal Debt held by the Federal Reserve up 238% since Obama's inauguration in January 2009

3. Printing money. Extremely inflationary. Deadly. Something to be avoided at all cost. Some economist call it monetizing the debt, others counterfeiting, other increased “liquidity.” It all depends on your perspective. From Main Street it simply means Wall Street, Washington DC, the elites, get the use of printed cash first, and Main Street pays for it in the form of inflation. The elites get the sugar and we get the you know what.
So what is the record of the Federal Reserve and the Obama Administration for printing money?
.
Federal debt held by the Federal Reserve for January 2009 was $492.3 billion and is currently $1.6647 trillion, a 238% increase.
Since the September 2008, before the TARP bailouts, the monetary base has increased from $886 billion to $2.7 trillion, a 206% increase.
Gold is up 82% since 2009 and many economists’ think that it is undervalued based on the inflationist policies of the Federal Reserve.
.
The 800 pound elephant in the room no one wants to talk about is federal spending and the inflationary policies of the Federal Reserve. Politicians do not want to talk about this, Republicans and Democrats, because the smart ones know this is a hidden tax on all Americans, poor, rich, white, black, that for most is invisible.

Monetary Base, the total amount of a currency that is either circulated in the hands of the public or in the commercial bank deposits held in the central bank's reserves. This measure of the money supply typically only includes the most liquid currencies

When the price of eggs goes up from 99 cents to $1.49, to $1.99 does anyone really notice?
.
Does anyone make the connection between the Obama Administration spending too much money and paying more for eggs?
.
No, but they should.
.
Jimmy Carter learned that big inflation numbers could cost him the election and the CPI was changed in July 1980 to deemphasize food and energy, the items that have the lowest “inelastic” numbers, or more simply things people need and are willing to buy at almost any price in the short term. Today the official “core” inflation rate is 2.9%.
I will submit to you that the biggest factor in the increase in gas prices is the Federal Reserve and the Obama Administrations reckless spending policies, followed by increase demand in the Pacific Rim countries, then global political tensions, and finally the Obama Administrations obstructionist energy policies designed to restrict supply from Canada and the United States, in that order.
The lesson for the working poor and the poor on government assistance is there is no free lunch. When the government spends too much money, you pay for it in lost jobs, lower wages, and inflation.
Be careful what you wish for, it might come true.

Anonymous Global Hacker Group Infiltrates Greek Ministry of Justice

The global group is angered over the raping and pillaging of the Greek people by politicians and bankers. Their anger is mostly directed at the bankers but it was the politicians that borrowed the money that placed the Greek citizens onto the road of insolvency.
Below is their demands from the Greek government;
Translated from the Greek:
Citizens of Greece
We are Anonymous.
We watch every day your government abolishes the constitution and institutions of the country.
We see them leading you closer and closer to poverty.
We see them pass laws that deprive you of any right to dignity.
We see them and deliver the country to the IMF and the bankers.
We know about the soup kitchens in schools,
for people who are left jobless and now wait in queues for a plate of food.
We know that your country voted ACTA in your effort to silence and other Greeks.
We know everything …
The Republic in Greece has died.
He died while a government that has not been elected by the people.
And for this reason that the time for discussion came and went.
Not negotiating anything with any of those who murdered him.
Can you hunt as you like, you can even capture some of us,
When you attempt to silence us …
But for every one that will capture 3 others will spring up. There are 5 or 10 or 100.
Now the Greeks are all Anonymous.
We are millions against you and the 300 in this war tear gas will not help you.
Occupying Government of Greece
These days are going to vote for a bill that will be the last nail in the coffin of the Greek.
A bill to return the country to a totalitarian rule.
To bring the country and its people in absolute poverty.
We will not allow another misery to the Greek people.
We demand your resignation immediately, and elections.
We demand not paid a cent to moneylenders ‘friends’ you.
We demand the immediate withdrawal of the IMF from Greece.
The Justice Department was only a small sample of what we’re capable of doing
Even you have not seen the full wrath of Anonymous.
For each article of a bill that would shame the vote,
we will shut the system and deleting an Inland Revenue debts of Greek citizens
Debts which requires them to fascist pay.
Can the demonstrations of the Greeks to their encounter with incredible violence,
anexelekta hitting, but the internet is our field. And I love this war.
We are many and we will be brief.
Citizens of Greece, Anonymous is now fighting on your side …
Government of Greece, let us wait …
E X P E C T U S !
J U S T I C E I S C O M I N G !
Of course the economic answer would be to follow the path of Iceland;
1. Identify the politicians who ran up the debt.
2. Throw them in jail.
3. Declare bankruptcy.
4. Get on with life.
It is not complex. The bankers want to make slaves of the Greek government and citizens. The politicians sold out their sovereignty for a easy job and a paycheck. What else is there to say?
The same situation we have in America.